4.6 Review

Aortic valve surgery: management and outcomes in the paediatric population

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 180, Issue 10, Pages 3129-3139

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04092-1

Keywords

Paediatric; Aorta; Congenital anomaly; Surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congenital anomalies of the aortic valve in childhood often require intervention, with treatment options including medical, percutaneous, and surgical repair or replacement. Surgical repair is typically the mainstay of treatment in paediatric cases, but limitations such as reintervention and restenosis rates exist.
Congenital anomalies of the aortic valve frequently necessitate intervention in childhood. The most common aortic valve pathologies present in childhood are aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Presentation of aortic valve disease depends on severity and presence of concomitant syndromes and valvular disorders. Treatment options are largely categorised as medical, percutaneous repair or surgical repair and replacement. Surgical techniques have been refined over the last few years making this the mainstay of treatment in paediatric cases. Whilst repair is considered in most instances before replacement, there are substantial limitations which are reflected in the frequency of reintervention and restenosis rate. Replacements are typically undertaken with tissue or mechanical prosthesis. The current gold-standard aortic valve replacement surgery is called the Ross procedure-where replacement is undertaken with a competent pulmonic valve and a simultaneous pulmonary homograft. Conclusion: In this review, we aim to outline the various surgical options and discuss efficacy and complications of various interventions. What is Known: Congenital aortic valve defects repair options medically and surgically What is New: Comparisons between surgical options for aortic valve repair including efficacy, risks and long-term outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available