4.4 Article

A simplified prediction method for additional stress on underlying layer of rigid pile-net composite foundation

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2021.1916603

Keywords

Rigid pile-net composite foundation; additional stress; equivalent entity method; numerical simulation; semi-empirical method

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China [19JCQNJC06900, 19JCYBJC22100]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [52008286, 52078336]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simplified semi-empirical method was proposed to predict the additional stress on the underlying layer of the rigid pile-net composite foundation, which was verified through finite element analysis and experimental tests. The key factor affecting the additional stress, the equivalent frictional resistance coefficient, was deduced and analyzed using static balance theory and the beta-method. The accuracy of the proposed simplified semi-empirical model was confirmed through good agreement between experimental and numerical results.
To propose a simplified semi-empirical method for predicting the additional stress on the underlying layer of the rigid pile-net composite foundation, a finite element analysis, which verified by a series of field tests and model tests, are carried out. Focusing on the equivalent entity method recommended by Technical code for composite foundation, the equivalent frictional resistance coefficient, which is a key factor affecting the additional stress, is deduced through the static balance theory and beta-method. Finite element analyses, including 432 tests, are conducted to analyse the effect of pile length, pile spacing, thickness of cushion layer, embankment height and geological conditions on the key coefficient. Then, a simplified semi-empirical model for predicting the key coefficient as well as the additional stress is proposed based on numerical results. The accuracy of the proposed model is verified by the good agreement between the experimental results and numerical results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available