4.6 Article

Haemodynamic benefit of bridging use of bosentan prior to pulmonary endarterectomy

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 840-847

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab137

Keywords

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; Pulmonary endarterectomy; Bosentan; Haemodynamic improvement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preoperative treatment with bosentan for CTEPH patients undergoing PEA surgery can improve postoperative PVR without adverse clinical events. Patients with higher preoperative PVR may benefit more from bosentan treatment before surgery.
OBJECTIVES: Some patients present with excessive pulmonary hypertension (PH) prior to pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This study was performed to evaluate the clinical role of pretreatment before PEA in CTEPH patients. METHODS: A total of 370 patients with CTEPH undergoing first PEA between 2003 and 2017 were divided into those receiving pretreatment with bosentan (group B: n = 119) and those without targeted pretreatment for PH (group C: n = 251). After selecting patients given bosentan (2-8 months) and using propensity score matching, comparable patient cohorts (n = 23 each) were created from both groups. PEA was performed in the standard manner, and the median number of extracted segments was 14. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in perioperative demographic characteristics or 30-day mortality (overall 5.7%) between the groups before and after matching. In patients with preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >= 800 dynes s/cm(5), a significantly larger decrease in PVR was found in group B (78%) compared to group C (68%) (P = 0.033). There was no significant difference in late survival between the groups after matching. The frequency of residual/persistent PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg) was lower in group B than in group C, although the difference was not significant (22% vs 39%, respectively, P = 0.200). Advanced age and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent predictors of both 30-day mortality and residual/persistent PH (odds ratio: age, 1.053, 1.013, cardiopulmonary bypass time, 1.065, 1.010, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative treatment of CTEPH patients with bosentan for 2-8 months can improve post-PEA PVR without adverse clinical events in patients with a high preoperative PVR. A temporary bridging regime appears beneficial in selected patients prior to PEA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available