4.7 Review

Denitrification using permeable reactive barriers with organic substrate or zero-valent iron fillers: controlling mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages 21045-21064

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13260-7

Keywords

Denitrification; Permeable reactive barriers; Nitrates; Organic substrate; Zero-valent iron

Funding

  1. Liaoning Provincial Scholarship for International Postgraduates
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41672248]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20180550040]
  4. Liaoning Distinguished Professorship Program [Liaojiaohan (2018)-35]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review paper analyzed the performance and mechanisms of two major PRB approaches for groundwater denitrification over the past 10 years using laboratory, modeling, and field-scale approaches. Important factors affecting denitrification efficiencies were discussed, and research gaps were identified for further investigation.
Nitrate as a diffusive agricultural contaminant has been causing substantial groundwater quality deterioration worldwide. In situ groundwater remediation techniques using permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) have attracted increasing interest. Particularly, PRBs based on biological denitrification, using the organic substrate as a biostimulator, and chemical nitrate reduction, using zero-valent iron (ZVI) as a reductant, are two major PRB approaches for groundwater denitrification. This review paper analyzed the published studies over the past 10 years (2010-2020) using laboratory, modeling, and field-scale approaches to explore the performance and mechanisms of these two types of PRBs. Important factors affecting the denitrification efficiencies as well as the influential mechanisms were discussed. Several research gaps have been identified and further research needs are discussed in the end.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available