4.7 Article

Impact of economic freedom on air pollution: configuration analysis of Asia-Pacific region

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 35, Pages 47932-47941

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13681-4

Keywords

Economic liberalism; Economic federalism; Air pollution; Asia-Pacific region; Rule of law; Size of government; Regulatory efficiency; Openness of market

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared economic liberalism with economic federalism in examining air pollution in the Asia-Pacific region and found that government size is a core factor influencing air pollution. It suggests that government spending, taxation, and other financial health policies can be key sources to control air pollution in the region.
Air pollution brings uncountable serious influences on human life during the last decade. This study is an attempt to compare economic liberalism with economic federalism in examining the problem of air pollution in the Asia-Pacific region. Economic analysts have different views with one school of thought arguing that air pollution is the cause of the failure of a free economy rather than the failure of government regulations, while another supports liberal economics and vice versa. After developing a conceptual framework, the study uses the technique of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine how the rule of law, the size of government, regulatory efficiency, and the openness of the market influence air pollution in countries across the region. The analysis identifies two solutions with government size being found to be a necessary and core condition that influences air pollution. The study thus provides insights and suggests that government spending, taxation, and other financial health policies can be used as key sources to control air pollution in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available