4.8 Article

Has Carbon Emissions Trading Reduced PM2.5 in China?

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 10, Pages 6631-6643

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00248

Keywords

Carbon trading; ETS; PM2.5; Difference-in-differences

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71774051]
  2. Major Program of the National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China [18ZDA106]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province [2020RC4016]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201906130158]
  5. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate [CX20190329]
  6. Texas AgriLife Research
  7. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project [1011850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

China's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) has successfully reduced PM2.5 concentrations by 4.8%, with the strongest effect observed in summer. The ETS pilots have positive spillovers on neighboring nonpilot cities within 300 km, especially downwind neighboring nonpilot cities, primarily due to firms adopting abatement activities and adjusting industrial structure. Additionally, the cobenefits of China's ETS pilots are greater in regions with larger carbon trading volume and higher carbon trading price.
China today has an urgent need to develop low-carbon policies that also address local air pollution. This study uses a difference-in-differences model to estimate the extent to which China's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which directly addresses CO2 emissions, has also generated cobenefits by reducing PM2.5. Using monthly PM2.5 concentration and weather data for 297 Chinese cities from January 2005 to December 2017, we find that (1) China's ETS has reduced PM2.5 concentrations by 4.8%, and this reduction effect is strongest in summer. The results are confirmed by robustness tests including propensity score matching, mahalanobis distance matching, two placebo tests, and controlling atmospheric policies. (2) The ETS pilots have positive spillovers on neighboring nonpilot cities within 300 km of the pilot cites, especially for those downwind neighboring nonpilot cities, and the ETS's cobenefits are primarily a result of firms adopting abatement activities and adjusting industrial structure. (3) The cobenefits of China's ETS pilots are greater in regions with larger carbon trading volume and higher carbon trading price. (4) The reduction in PM(2.)5 concentration caused by China's ETS may have avoided 23,363 deaths and saved $41.38 billion annually in GDP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available