4.7 Article

A rapid 3D reproduction system of dam-break floods constrained by post-disaster information

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104994

Keywords

Post-disaster information; Dam-break flood; Spatiotemporal process; Rapid reproduction; 3D visualization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2034202, 41871289and 41941019]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2020JDTD0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a platform for rapid 3D reproduction of dam-break floods, utilizing key technologies such as CA-based numerical models, post-disaster information-constrained reproduction, and dynamic augmented representation. Experimental results demonstrated that the system can achieve rapid reproduction in less than 1 hour.
The 3D reproduction of dam-break floods plays a key role in emergency management and disaster information dissemination. However, existing systems for the simulation of floods have some deficiencies. First, the input data parameters are complex. Second, the simulation process is cumbersome and time consuming, and it lacks a complete workflow. In this paper, we develop a platform for the rapid 3D reproduction of dam-break floods. Key technologies, such as numerical models of dam-break floods based on cellular automata (CA), 3D reproduction constrained by post-disaster information, and dynamic augmented representation, are discussed in detail. Then, two typical dam-break flood cases are selected for experimental analysis. The experimental results show that the system can support the rapid 3D reproduction of dam-break floods constrained by post-disaster information. Compared with that of other simulation systems, the reproduction time is reduced to less than 1 h, and this system supports rapid reproduction at different times and positions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available