4.6 Article

Prediction of sgRNA Off-Target Activity in CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Using Graph Convolution Network

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23050608

Keywords

gene editing; deep learning; graph convolutional network; sgRNA; link prediction

Funding

  1. NVIDIA Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful genome-editing technology that faces challenges such as off-target effects. Researchers have proposed a graph-based method to predict the off-target efficacy of sgRNA in the CRISPR/Cas9 system, which is easy to understand and replicate.
CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful genome-editing technology that has been widely applied in targeted gene repair and gene expression regulation. One of the main challenges for the CRISPR/Cas9 system is the occurrence of unexpected cleavage at some sites (off-targets) and predicting them is necessary due to its relevance in gene editing research. Very few deep learning models have been developed so far to predict the off-target propensity of single guide RNA (sgRNA) at specific DNA fragments by using artificial feature extract operations and machine learning techniques; however, this is a convoluted process that is difficult to understand and implement for researchers. In this research work, we introduce a novel graph-based approach to predict off-target efficacy of sgRNA in the CRISPR/Cas9 system that is easy to understand and replicate for researchers. This is achieved by creating a graph with sequences as nodes and by using a link prediction method to predict the presence of links between sgRNA and off-target inducing target DNA sequences. Features for the sequences are extracted from within the sequences. We used HEK293 and K562 t datasets in our experiments. GCN predicted the off-target gene knockouts (using link prediction) by predicting the links between sgRNA and off-target sequences with an auROC value of 0.987.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available