4.6 Article

EEG Fractal Analysis Reflects Brain Impairment after Stroke

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23050592

Keywords

neurophysiology; stroke; EEG; neuroplasticity; fractal analysis

Funding

  1. ITALIAN MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS [PGR-01045-SoftAct]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the fractal changes in resting-state EEG signals after stroke, finding that both Higuchi index and Tortuosity values were significantly lower in stroke survivors, indicating less complex brain activity. These metrics show promise in tracking behavioral changes post-stroke and may be reliable biomarkers for neurorehabilitation.
Stroke is the commonest cause of disability. Novel treatments require an improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms of recovery. Fractal approaches have demonstrated that a single metric can describe the complexity of seemingly random fluctuations of physiological signals. We hypothesize that fractal algorithms applied to electroencephalographic (EEG) signals may track brain impairment after stroke. Sixteen stroke survivors were studied in the hyperacute (<48 h) and in the acute phase (similar to 1 week after stroke), and 35 stroke survivors during the early subacute phase (from 8 days to 32 days and after similar to 2 months after stroke): We compared resting-state EEG fractal changes using fractal measures (i.e., Higuchi Index, Tortuosity) with 11 healthy controls. Both Higuchi index and Tortuosity values were significantly lower after a stroke throughout the acute and early subacute stage compared to healthy subjects, reflecting a brain activity which is significantly less complex. These indices may be promising metrics to track behavioral changes in the very early stage after stroke. Our findings might contribute to the neurorehabilitation quest in identifying reliable biomarkers for a better tailoring of rehabilitation pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available