Journal
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111876
Keywords
Viscous inertial mass damper (VIMD); Damper configuration; Damper parameters; Pseudo-negative stiffness; Stochastic performance optimization
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51638012]
- China Scholarship Council (CSC)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examines the efficacy of using an inertial mass damper (IMD) in parallel with a viscous damper (VD) on the sky bridge to control the vibration of two adjacent towers under random earthquake excitation. Through optimization analysis, it is found that the viscous inertial mass damper (VIMD) can achieve better control performance and requires smaller damping coefficient and axial stiffness compared to traditional viscous dampers. This makes it a useful alternative for engineering practice in vibration mitigation strategies.
Many research studies have focused on a novel kind of damper involved with an inertial/gyro mass component, called the inertial mass damper (IMD). Different realizations of the IMD share common standard features: a sizeable apparent mass and the pseudo-negative dynamic stiffness. The connected control method (CCM) has been proven effective for mitigating vibration between adjacent flexible structures. This paper explores the efficacy of using an IMD in parallel with a viscous damper (termed VIMD) configured in the sky bridge to control the vibration of two adjacent towers under random earthquake excitation. First, numerical models of two buildings are developed using a Timoshenko beam model, which can accommodate both bending and shear deformation. Key damper parameters are explored through a parametric study. Then, stochastic optimization is performed to determine optimum damper parameters and the most effective configuration. The optimization results are analyzed in detail, and guidelines for the damper configuration are recommended. By comparing the optimal control performance between the VIMD and traditional viscous damper (VD), the following conclusions can be drawn: due to its pseudo-negative stiffness characteristics and large damper force, the VIMD can achieve better control performances for a wide range of the axial stiffness of the sky bridge; the VIMD requires a smaller damping coefficient and axial stiffness, which can result in smaller damper sizes and member sections of the sky bridge. Therefore, the VIMD is demonstrated to be a useful alternative for engineering practice in CCM vibration mitigation strategies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available