4.7 Article

The role of energy storage in the uptake of renewable energy: A model comparison approach

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112159

Keywords

Intermittent renewables; Electricity storage; Emissions reduction; Energy systems modelling

Funding

  1. Sustainable Gas Institute
  2. Royal Dutch Shell, Enagas SA
  3. Newton/NERC/FAPESP Sustainable Gas Futures project [NE/N018656/1]
  4. e3 Hub at HEC Montreal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the role of electricity storage in high-renewable energy systems, finding that storage can help reduce emissions at lower costs but may face competition with other low-carbon options in the presence of carbon taxes. The study also highlights the main shortcomings in the modeling of electricity storage in integrated assessment models.
The power sector needs to ensure a rapid transition towards a low-carbon energy system to avoid the dangerous consequences of greenhouse gas emissions. Storage technologies are a promising option to provide the power system with the flexibility required when intermittent renewables are present in the electricity generation mix. This paper focuses on the role of electricity storage in energy systems with high shares of renewable sources. The study encompasses a model comparison approach where four models (GENeSYS-MOD, MUSE, NATEM, and urbs MX) are used to analyse the storage uptake in North America. The analysis addresses the conditions affecting storage uptake in each country and its dependence on resource availability, technology costs, and public policies. Results show that storage may promote emissions reduction at lower costs when renewable mandates are in place whereas in presence of carbon taxes, renewables may compete with other low-carbon options. The study also highlights the main modelling approach shortcomings in the modelling of electricity storage in integrated assessment models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available