4.7 Article

Cost-based siting and sizing of energy stations and pipeline networks in integrated energy system

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113958

Keywords

Regional integrated energy system (RIES); Energy station (ES); Pipeline network (PN); Siting and sizing; Algorithms; Lowest annual cost (LAC)

Funding

  1. Project of Beijing Social Science Fund [18GL042]
  2. State Grid Corporation Science and Technology Project [SGHEJY00JJJS1900017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a synergy planning method for siting and sizing energy stations and pipeline networks, and verifies the effectiveness of the method in an experiment in a hypothetical region. The results show that synergy planning can save costs and reduce load peak-valley difference rate.
Siting and sizing of energy stations (ESs) and pipeline networks (PNs) significantly influence views on the economy of regional integrated energy system (RIES). In this paper, we present a synergy planning method for siting and sizing ESs and PNs. This study describes the basic structure of ESs and PNs in RIES, clearly points out influencing factors that should be considered in the planning model. Then, with flow velocity, pipe diameter, equipment capacity, and the location of ESs and PNs as variables, the cost-based function model is built based on many constraints. The Genetic Algorithm (GA) based heuristic algorithm and the PNs planning algorithm based on ?Dijkstra Algorithm (DA) + Simulated Annealing (SA)? are used to solve the problem proposed in this paper. In the results and discussion, the proposed model and method are verified by a hypothetical region from OpenStreetMap. The economic changes are studied in a basic scenario and three comparison scenarios. The results show that synergy planning can save 293,320 $ and reduce the load peak-valley difference rate by 3.24%. Moreover, optimizing the flow velocity can reduce 0?32.04% lowest annual cost (LAC).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available