4.7 Article

Evaluation of thermal sensation models for predicting thermal comfort in dynamic outdoor and indoor environments

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 238, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110847

Keywords

Model validation; Non-uniform; Transient

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2018YFC0705300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a new thermal sensation model for predicting thermal perception in cars, which showed validity in outdoor environments with sudden changes in solar radiation but lower accuracy in indoor environments with temperature gradients or sudden changes, compared to other thermal models.
Thermal sensation models are commonly used to assess thermal perception in various indoor environments. Our previous work developed a new model to predict thermal sensation in cars that uses gradual change in thermal load on the face, sudden change in solar radiation on the face, mean skin temperature and outdoor air temperature as predictors. The present investigation selected 11 outdoor scenarios and 20 indoor scenarios from the literature to further verify the accuracy of the thermal sensation model. Four other thermal models, the predicted mean vote (PMV) model, the dynamic thermal sensation (DTS) model, a model from the University of California, Berkeley (UCB), and a transient outdoor thermal comfort model (Lai's) were compared with the new model for the 32 scenarios. The results confirmed the validity of the new model in an outdoor environment with sudden change in solar radiation. The new model was able to predict the trend of thermal changes, but the accuracy was not as good as that of the PMV model in an environment with indoor temperature gradient/sudden changes. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available