4.4 Article

Challenges in Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas: from Histology to Molecular Immunohistochemistry

Journal

ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 228-244

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12022-021-09675-0

Keywords

Pheochromocytoma; Abdominal paraganglioma; Review; Histology; PASS; GAPP; Immunohistochemistry; Molecular diagnostics

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institute
  2. Swedish Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abdominal paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors with malignant potential, known for their rarity, spectacular presentation due to excess catecholamine secretion, and association with genetic mutations and hereditary syndromes. Clinicians face challenges in accurately diagnosing and prognosticating these lesions due to their complexity and potential for metastasis.
Abdominal paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas (PPGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors of the infradiaphragmatic paraganglia and adrenal medulla, respectively. Although few pathologists outside of endocrine tertiary centers will ever diagnose such a lesion, the tumors are well known through the medical community-possible due to a combination of the sheer rarity, their often-spectacular presentation due to excess catecholamine secretion as well as their unrivaled coupling to constitutional susceptibility gene mutations and hereditary syndromes. All PPGLs are thought to harbor malignant potential, and therefore pose several challenges to the practicing pathologist. Specifically, a responsible diagnostician should recognize both the capacity and limitations of histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular algorithms to pinpoint high risk for future metastatic disease. This focused review aims to provide the surgical pathologist with a condensed update regarding the current strategies available in order to deliver an accurate prognostication of these enigmatic lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available