4.6 Article

ClustPTF: Clustering-based parallel tensor factorization for the diverse multi-criteria recommendation

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101041

Keywords

Clustering; Recommendation diversity; Multi-criteria Recommender system; Sentiment analysis; Parallel Tensor factorization

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [NRF-2020R1A2B5B01002207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ClustPTF is a clustering-based parallel tensor factorization method that uses sentiment analysis and K-means clustering to improve recommendation diversity and predictive performance. Experimental results show that ClustPTF significantly outperforms traditional methods in recommendation diversity and response time, while also achieving significant improvements in predictive performance.
In the recommender system field, diversity as the measure of recommendation quality has gained much attention recently. However, many pieces of research have shown that it has a trade-off relation with predictive performance. To improve recommendation diversity and predictive performance in multi-criteria recommender systems, we propose a clustering-based parallel tensor factorization (ClustPTF). In the ClustPTF, sentiment analysis alleviates model sparsity, and the K-means clustering considering rating behaviors groups similar user preferences into sub-models and leads to improve recommendation diversity. The sub-models are then factorized in parallel to predict ratings in near real-time. With one dataset gathered from TripAdvisor, experiments showed that the ClustPTF considerably improve recommendation diversity (13.44x of a conventional tensor factorization (TF0)) and response time (23.13x of the TF0). Even its predictive performance is superior to the TF0 (41.06% improvement in MAE). Furthermore, the ClustPTF outperformed recent techniques in recommendation diversity and predictive performance (i.e., MAE and precision).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available