4.6 Article

Crucial factors governing the electrochemical impedance on protein-modified surfaces

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 388, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138616

Keywords

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Polystyrene nanoparticles; Polyacrylic acid; Bovine serum albumin; Cationized bovine serum albumin; Ionic strength; Ionic charge

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic under the project CEITEC 2020 [LQ1601]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [1916273Y]
  3. Operational Programme Research, Development and Education - Project Internal Grant Agency of Masaryk University [CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016943]
  4. MEYS CR [LM2018127]
  5. Brno City Municipality, JCMM, z.s.p.o

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, ionic attraction/repulsion and steric hindrance of protein components are two main factors influencing impedance response. Ionic interactions dominate at low ionic strength and low concentrations of redox-active components, while the steric hindrance of immobilized proteins gradually increases with increasing ionic strength and redox-active component concentration.
Three different electrode surfaces - two nanoporous and one modified with polyelectrolyte - provided with positively and negatively charged model proteins were studied at different conditions to determine characteristics of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in biosensing. The impedance response in the presence of [Fe(CN)(6)(4-/3-) was simultaneously influenced by two effects - ionic attraction/repulsion and steric hindrance of protein components. The ionic interactions dominated at low ionic strength and at low concentrations of redox probe. On the other hand, the steric hindrance of immobilized proteins affecting mass transfer towards the electrode gained impact gradually with the increasing ionic strength and with the concentration of the redox-active component. The simultaneous effect of these two variables can lead to confusing results which are often misinterpreted when evaluating results from impedimetric affinity biosensors. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available