4.6 Article

Resistivity of mesopore-confined ionic liquid determined by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 378, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138112

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Supercapacitor; Ionic liquid; Anodized aluminum oxide; Electrochemical double layer capacitor

Funding

  1. United States Air Force [FA9302-17-C-0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ordered carbon nanotube arrays were used as electrodes for supercapacitors with neat ionic liquid electrolyte, and uncatalyzed chemical vapor deposition may lead to blocked CNTs and reduced active area. The increased resistivity of the electrolyte within the pores may be due to hydrophilic surface functionalities on the surface of the CNTs.
Ordered carbon nanotube (CNT) arrays with pore diameter 24.4 +/- 4.6 nm formed within anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) bonded to Si were used as electrodes for supercapacitors with neat EMIM-BF4 ionic liquid as the electrolyte. A series of devices with increasing AAO thickness (equal to CNT length) were tested using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Data were fit using the de Levie model of porous electrodes to determine the electrochemically active surface area and the in-pore electrolyte resistivity. The results indicate that uncatalyzed chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of CNTs in AAO can lead to blocked CNTs and reduced active area. The average resistivity of the electrolyte within the pores across the four devices tested was determined to be approximately 383 Omega cm, more than five times higher than the reported bulk resistivity of 70.9 Omega cm. It is possible that the enhanced resistivity is due to hydrophilic surface functionalities on the surface of the CNTs. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available