4.6 Article

Morbidity and extent of surgical resection of carcinoid tumors after endobronchial treatment

Journal

EJSO
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 2989-2994

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.025

Keywords

Typical carcinoid; Atypical carcinoid; Endobronchial therapy; Thoracic surgery

Funding

  1. ORAS (Oncological Research Albert Schweitzer Hospital)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the impact of endobronchial therapy (EBT) on bronchial carcinoid, and whether EBT reduces the extent of surgical resection or increases surgical morbidity. The analysis found no significant difference in postoperative complications between patients who underwent EBT before surgery and those who did not.
Objectives: This study assessed whether endobronchial therapy (EBT) for bronchial carcinoid, if not curative, reduces the extent of the surgical resection and whether EBT is associated with increased surgical morbidity. Material and methods: Analysis was performed in a cohort of patients with bronchial carcinoid who have undergone surgical resection. A group that underwent EBT before the surgery (S + EBT) was compared with a group where no EBT was performed (S-EBT). Postoperative complications were also compared between both groups. Results: A total of 254 patients treated for a bronchial carcinoid tumor between 2003 and 2019 were screened for inclusion. A total of 65 surgically treated patients were included, of whom 41 (63%) underwent EBT prior to surgery. In 5 out of 41 patients (12%) from the S thorn EBT group, less parenchyma was resected versus 2 out of 24 (8%) from the S-EBT group (OR 1.528, 95% CI 0.273-8.562, p = 1.000). Two patients from the S+EBT group (5%) underwent lobectomy instead of sleeve lobectomy versus 0 from the S-EBT group (OR 1.051, 95% CI 0.981-1.127, p = 0.527). Comparing complications between the S thorn EBT and S-EBT group did not result in increased postoperative surgical morbidity (15% S + EBT, 24% S-EBT). Conclusion: EBT, if not curative, does not reduce the extent of the subsequent surgical resection. Therefore, if curative EBT is not anticipated, patients should directly be referred for surgery. If curative EBT seems feasible, it should be attempted not only because surgical resection can be prevented, but also because failure of EBT is not associated with excess surgical morbidity. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available