Journal
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 6, Pages 1387-1407Publisher
SOC ECONOMIC GEOLOGISTS, INC
DOI: 10.5382/econgeo.4837
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Mineral Resources Tasmania
- ARC Linkage grant Ore Deposits and Tectonic Evolution of the Lachlan Orogen, SE Australia
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study explores the connection between Tasmanian tin deposits and their potential source granites using U-Pb cassiterite dating. Tin mineralization in Tasmania occurred between 391 +/- 6.3 and 359 +/- 7.8 Ma, spanning 32 million years, and demonstrates the importance of cassiterite dating in understanding the origin of tin deposits in complex terrains.
The island state of Tasmania is the most important tin producer in Australia. The spatial and genetic relationship between Tasmanian tin deposits and Devonian-Carboniferous granites, which intruded throughout the Tabberabberan orogeny, has long been understood. However, little geochronological data is available to link mineralization to nearby intrusions. In this study, we investigate the connection between 19 Tasmanian tin deposits and their potential source granites, using U-Pb cassiterite dating by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Archean pegmatitic cassiterite was also characterized and used for the calibration of U-Pb ratios. Tin mineralization in Tasmania occurred between 391 +/- 6.3 and 359 +/- 7.8 Ma, which is coincident with most postorogenic granites of the Tabberabberan orogeny. In conjunction with the granite ages, cassiterite ages become younger from the east of the state to the west, and tin mineralization occurred over a protracted period spanning 32 m.y. Dating of several placer cassiterite samples produced unexpected results, such as the occurrence of 374 +/- 4.7 Ma cassiterite on eastern King Island, an area known only to contain the 350 Ma Grassy granite, suggesting a distant provenance. Tasmanian cassiterite rarely shows evidence of Pb loss; however, some analyses are characterized by elevated Th and U, likely caused by microinclusions such as monazite, which may have a detrimental effect on cassiterite U-Pb dating. This study demonstrates the utility of cassiterite dating for understanding the origin of tin deposits in complex terrains with protracted periods of tin mineralization.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available