4.8 Article

A group of ectomycorrhizal fungi restricts organic matter accumulation in boreal forest

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1341-1351

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13746

Keywords

carbon sequestration; decomposition; functional guilds; functional redundancy; fungal communities; metabarcoding; mor layer; nitrogen; soil; statistical modelling

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2011-1747, 2012-1257]
  2. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Swedish boreal forests, a specific fungi species can lead to a 33% decrease in local carbon storage in organic topsoil, challenging traditional views. This suggests that certain ectomycorrhizal fungi can assist decomposers in maintaining organic matter turnover and tree productivity.
Boreal forest soils are important global carbon sinks, with significant storage in the organic topsoil. Decomposition of these stocks requires oxidative enzymes, uniquely produced by fungi. Across Swedish boreal forests, we found that local carbon storage in the organic topsoil was 33% lower in the presence of a group of closely related species of ectomycorrhizal fungi - Cortinarius acutus s.l.. This observation challenges the prevailing view that ectomycorrhizal fungi generally act to increase carbon storage in soils but supports the idea that certain ectomycorrhizal fungi can complement free-living decomposers, maintaining organic matter turnover, nutrient cycling and tree productivity under nutrient-poor conditions. The indication that a narrow group of fungi may exert a major influence on carbon cycling questions the prevailing dogma of functional redundancy among microbial decomposers. Cortinarius acutus s.l. responds negatively to stand-replacing disturbance, and associated population declines are likely to increase soil carbon sequestration while impeding long-term nutrient cycling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available