4.8 Article

Bryophyte C:N:P stoichiometry, biogeochemical niches and elementome plasticity driven by environment and coexistence

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1375-1386

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13752

Keywords

elemental composition; liverworts; mosses; niche partitioning; nitrogen; phosphorus

Categories

Funding

  1. British Ecological Society [SR18/1341]
  2. European Research Council Synergy [ERC-2013-SyG 610028-IMBALANCE-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that bryophyte species have C:N:P ratios intermediate between marine plankton and vascular plants, with differentiated biogeochemical niches among species that are phylogenetically conserved. Differences in individual and species-specific elementomes increased with coexistence between species.
Ecological stoichiometry and studies of biogeochemical niches have mainly focused on plankton and vascular plants, but the phenotypically closest modern relatives of early plants, bryophytes, have been largely neglected. We analysed C:N:P stoichiometries and elemental compositions (K, Na, Mg, Ca, S, Fe) of 35 widely distributed bryophyte species inhabiting springs. We estimated bryophyte C:N:P ratios and their biogeochemical niches, investigated how elementomes respond to the environment and determined whether they tend to diverge more for coexisting than non-coexisting individuals and species. The median C:N:P was 145:8:1, intermediate between Redfield's ratio for marine plankton and those for vascular plants. Biogeochemical niches were differentiated amongst species and were phylogenetically conserved. Differences in individual and species-specific elementomes increased with coexistence between species. Our results provide an evolutionary bridge between the ecological stoichiometries of algae and vascular plants and suggest that differences in elementomes could be used to understand community assemblages and functional diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available