4.8 Article

Persistence of a reef fish metapopulation via network connectivity: theory and data

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1121-1132

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13721

Keywords

Amphiprion clarkii; connectivity; dispersal kernel; metapopulation dynamics; network persistence; self‐ persistence

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [OCE-1430218, OISE-1743711]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  3. ORAU Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement award
  4. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  5. Rutgers School of Environmental and Biological Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining metapopulation persistence requires understanding demographic rates and patch connectivity. Despite stable population abundances, connectivity pattern can impact metapopulation's ability to persist in isolation.
Determining metapopulation persistence requires understanding both demographic rates and patch connectivity. Persistence is well understood in theory but has proved challenging to test empirically for marine and other species with high connectivity that precludes classic colonisation-extinction dynamics. Here, we assessed persistence for a yellowtail anemonefish (Amphiprion clarkii) metapopulation using 7 years of annual sampling data along 30 km of coastline. We carefully accounted for uncertainty in demographic rates. Despite stable population abundances through time and sufficient production of surviving offspring for replacement, the pattern of connectivity made the metapopulation unlikely to persist in isolation and reliant on immigrants from outside habitat. To persist in isolation, the metapopulation would need higher fecundity or to retain essentially all recruits produced. This assessment of persistence in a marine metapopulation shows that stable abundance alone does not indicate persistence, emphasising the necessity of assessing both demographic and connectivity processes to understand metapopulation dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available