4.5 Article

The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground motion models in the western US

Journal

EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 2315-2341

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/87552930211011200

Keywords

National Seismic Hazard Model; ground motion models; multi-period response spectra; basin depth; site-effects

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The USGS National Seismic Hazard Model is the scientific foundation of seismic design regulations in the U.S. The 2018 update includes significant changes to ground motion models to meet new multi-period response spectra requirements. Local seismic velocity models were used to more accurately estimate ground motions in the Western United States.
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) is the scientific foundation of seismic design regulations in the United States and is regularly updated to consider the best available science and data. The 2018 update of the conterminous U.S. NSHM includes significant changes to the underlying ground motion models (GMMs), most of which are necessary to enable the new multi-period response spectra (MPRS) requirements of seismic design regulations that use hazard results for 22 spectral periods and eight site classes. This article focuses on the GMMs used in the western United States (WUS) and is a companion to a recent article on the GMMs used in the central and eastern United States (CEUS). In the WUS, for crustal and subduction earthquakes, two models used in previous versions of the NSHM are excluded to provide consistency over all considered periods and site classes. To more accurately estimate ground motions at long periods in the vicinity of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Salt Lake City, and Seattle, the 2018 NSHM incorporates deep sedimentary basin depth from local seismic velocity models. The subduction GMMs considered lack basin depth terms and are modified to include an additional scale factor to account for this. This article documents the WUS GMMs used in the 2018 NSHM update and provides detail on the changes to GMM medians, aleatory variability, epistemic uncertainty, and site-effect models. It compares each of these components with those considered in prior NSHMs and discusses their total effect on hazard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available