4.7 Article

A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 44, Issue 7, Pages 1595-1603

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc20-2878

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002489, P30DK124723]
  2. National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
  3. ADA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog, insulin icodec, using different titration algorithms. The results showed that icodec was efficacious and well tolerated across all three titration algorithms, with titration algorithm B demonstrating the best balance between glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia.
OBJECTIVE Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive adults (n = 205) with type 2 diabetes and HbA(1c) 7-10% while treated with oral glucose-lowering medications initiated once-weekly icodec titrations A (prebreakfast self-measured blood glucose target 80-130 mg/dL; adjustment +/- 21 units/week; n = 51), B (80-130 mg/dL; +/- 28 units/week; n = 51), or C (70-108 mg/dL; +/- 28 units/week; n = 52), or once-daily insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) (80-130 mg/dL; +/- 4 units/day; n = 51), all titrated weekly. Percentage of time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) during weeks 15 and 16 was measured using continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS TIR improved from baseline (means: A, 57.0%; B, 55.2%; C, 51.0%; IGlar U100, 55.3%) to weeks 15 and 16 (estimated mean: A, 76.6%; B, 83.0%; C, 80.9%; IGlar U100, 75.9%). TIR was greater for titration B than for IGlar U100 (estimated treatment difference 7.08%-points; 95% CI 2.12 to 12.04; P = 0.005). No unexpected safety signals were observed. Level 2 hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was low in all groups (0.05, 0.15, 0.38, 0.00 events per patient-year of exposure for icodec titrations A, B, and C and IGlar U100, respectively), with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS Once-weekly icodec was efficacious and well tolerated across all three titration algorithms investigated. The results for icodec titration A (80-130 mg/dL; +/- 21 units/week) displayed the best balance between glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available