4.5 Article

Sleep problems in children with cerebral palsy and their parents

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 11, Pages 1344-1350

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14920

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that children with cerebral palsy were more likely to have sleep problems compared to typically developing children, with non-ambulatory children being more severely affected. The parents of non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy reported lower satisfaction with their child's and their own sleep.
Aim To describe: (1) the frequency and types of sleep problems, (2) parent-rated satisfaction with their child's and their own sleep, and (3) child factors related to the occurrence of sleep problems in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and their parents. The secondary objective was to compare the sleep outcomes of children with CP with those from typically developing children and their parents. Method The Sleep section of the 24-hour activity checklist was used to assess the sleep of children with CP and their parents and the sleep of typically developing children and their parents. Results The sleep outcomes of 90 children with CP (median age 5y, range 0-11y, 53 males, 37 females, 84.4% ambulatory) and 157 typically developing peers (median age 5y, range 0-12y; 79 males, 78 females) and their parents were collected. Children with CP were more likely to have a sleep problem than typically developing children. Non-ambulatory children with CP were more severely affected by sleep problems than ambulatory children. The parents of non-ambulatory children were less satisfied about their child's and their own sleep. Waking up during the night, pain/discomfort in bed, and daytime fatigue were more common in children with CP and more prevalent in children who were non-ambulatory. Interpretation These findings highlight the need to integrate sleep assessment into routine paediatric health care practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available