4.3 Review

The Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes, NAFLD, and Cardiovascular Risk

Journal

CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11892-021-01383-7

Keywords

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Type 2 diabetes; Fibrosis; Cirrhosis; Cardiovascular disease; Insulin resistance; Metabolic syndrome

Funding

  1. NIEHS [P42ES010337]
  2. NCATS [UL1TR001442]
  3. NIDDK [U01DK061734, R01DK106419, P30DK120515, R01DK121378, R01DK124318]
  4. NHLBI [P01HL147835]
  5. NIAAA [U01AA029019]
  6. DOD PRCRP [W81XWH-18-2-0026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NAFLD and T2DM are strongly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Patients with both conditions may have a synergistic increase in cardiovascular risk. Certain anti-diabetic therapies have shown beneficial effects on both NAFLD and CVD.
Purpose of Review Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are strongly associated. Both also associate with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recent Findings Several studies have provided evidence that NAFLD could be an independent CVD risk factor. Given the strong association between NAFLD and T2DM, assessing the independent CV effect of these two conditions remains challenging. However, patients with T2DM and NAFLD exhibit higher risk of CVD compared with T2DM without NAFLD suggesting a potential synergistic increase of CV risk in patients with both T2DM and NAFLD supported by several shared pathophysiological pathways. Several anti-diabetic therapies have shown beneficial effect on both NAFLD and CVD. Patients with T2DM and NAFLD should be considered at high risk of CVD and could benefit from more intensive CV prevention. Additional long-term follow-up is needed to demonstrate that the treatment of NAFLD effectively reduces the risk of CVD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available