4.7 Review

Neither soyfoods nor isoflavones warrant classification as endocrine disruptors: a technical review of the observational and clinical data

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Volume 62, Issue 21, Pages 5824-5885

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1895054

Keywords

Phytoestrogens; feminization; fertility; cancer; hormones; children; adults; soy; isoflavone; endocrine

Funding

  1. Soy Nutrition Institute
  2. European Plant-based Food Association
  3. Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis & Clinical Trials Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isoflavones found in soybeans are not believed to have adverse effects on the endocrine system in humans, including thyroid, breast, endometrial tissues, testosterone, estrogen, and sperm parameters. Research suggests that isoflavones should not be classified as endocrine disruptors.
Soybeans are a rich source of isoflavones, which are classified as phytoestrogens. Despite numerous proposed benefits, isoflavones are often classified as endocrine disruptors, based primarily on animal studies. However, there are ample human data regarding the health effects of isoflavones. We conducted a technical review, systematically searching Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (from inception through January 2021). We included clinical studies, observational studies, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA) that examined the relationship between soy and/or isoflavone intake and endocrine-related endpoints. 417 reports (229 observational studies, 157 clinical studies and 32 SRMAs) met our eligibility criteria. The available evidence indicates that isoflavone intake does not adversely affect thyroid function. Adverse effects are also not seen on breast or endometrial tissue or estrogen levels in women, or testosterone or estrogen levels, or sperm or semen parameters in men. Although menstrual cycle length may be slightly increased, ovulation is not prevented. Limited insight could be gained about possible impacts of in utero isoflavone exposure, but the existing data are reassuring. Adverse effects of isoflavone intake were not identified in children, but limited research has been conducted. After extensive review, the evidence does not support classifying isoflavones as endocrine disruptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available