4.7 Article

Energy savings, thermal conductivity, micro and macro structural analysis of fired clay bricks incorporating cigarette butts

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122755

Keywords

Energy saving; Recycling; Cigarette butts; Fired clay bricks; Thermal conductivity

Funding

  1. RMIT University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study produced lightweight structural bricks incorporating various percentages of cigarette butts to investigate thermal properties, energy savings, porosity, and micro- and macro-structure. Adding CBs can reduce thermal conductivity of bricks and improve energy-saving effects.
In this study, lightweight structural bricks incorporating various percentages of cigarette butts (CBs) are produced to investigate the thermal properties, energy savings, porosity and micro- and macro-structure. A novel method was developed to monitor the energy consumption of the furnace during the firing process, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray micro-Computed Tomography (micro-CT) imaging were used to characterize the quantity, distribution, size, and shape of the micro- and macro-scale pores of the brick samples incorporating CBs. The energy savings of the microporous bricks with 1% CBs by weight (wt.) varied between 8% (theoretical value) and 10.2% (measured value). Clay bricks showed an increase in porosity and a decrease in density with the increase in CB content, which reduced thermal conductivity. Thermal conductivity was measured to reduce from 0.463 to 0.347 Wm(-1) K-1 with the addition of 2% CBs by wt. compared to the control bricks. The 3D models of the bricks incorporating various percentages of CBs demonstrated a homogenous distribution of pores within the brick structures. On a micrometer scale, the size of the micro- and macro- pores varied within a range of 0.035 to 1.365 mm. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available