Journal
ORNITHOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ornithapp/duab018
Keywords
co-production; knowing-doing gap; ornithology; science producer; science user
Categories
Funding
- Turkey Nature Conservation
- Christensen Fund
- Conservation Leadership Programme
- UNDP-GEF SGP
- Whitley Fund
- Puget Sound Partnership
- Stillaguamish Tribe
- Liber Ero Foundation
- Cats and Birds National Advisory Committee
- Stewardship Centre for British Columbia
- Environment and Climate Change Canada
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Hatch Project funds
- Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station
- NOAA [NA16NOS4200088, 8200025414]
- National Fish and Wildlife Foundation [324423]
- Margaret A. Cargill Foundation
- U.S. Department of Agriculture's Conservation Innovation Grants program
- National Parks General Directorate
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The recognized gap between research and implementation in avian conservation can be overcome with translational ecology, which involves collaborative efforts from science producers and users to co-develop ecological research addressing conservation issues. Following translational ecology principles can lead to improved conservation decision-making and delivery of outcomes accessible to broader audiences. Embracing translational ecology can help close the research-implementation gap and ensure scientifically informed management decisions in the face of environmental threats to avian communities worldwide.
The recognized gap between research and implementation in avian conservation can be overcome with translational ecology, an intentional approach in which science producers and users from multiple disciplines work collaboratively to co-develop and deliver ecological research that addresses management and conservation issues. Avian conservation naturally lends itself to translational ecology because birds are well studied, typically widespread, often exhibit migratory behaviors transcending geopolitical boundaries, and necessitate coordinated conservation efforts to accommodate resource and habitat needs across the full annual cycle. In this perspective, we highlight several case studies from bird conservation practitioners and the ornithological and conservation social sciences exemplifying the 6 core translational ecology principles introduced in previous studies: collaboration, engagement, commitment, communication, process, and decision-framing. We demonstrate that following translational approaches can lead to improved conservation decision-making and delivery of outcomes via co-development of research and products that are accessible to broader audiences and applicable to specific management decisions (e.g., policy briefs and decision-support tools). We also identify key challenges faced during scientific producer-user engagement, potential tactics for overcoming these challenges, and lessons learned for overcoming the research-implementation gap. Finally, we recommend strategies for building a stronger translational ecology culture to further improve the integration of these principles into avian conservation decisions. By embracing translational ecology, avian conservationists and ornithologists can be well positioned to ensure that future management decisions are scientifically informed and that scientific research is sufficiently relevant to managers. Ultimately, such teamwork can help close the research-implementation gap in the conservation sciences during a time when environmental issues are threatening avian communities and their habitats at exceptional rates and at broadening spatial scales worldwide.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available