4.7 Article

Bilateral value-added services and pricing strategies of the third-party platform considering the cross-network externality

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107196

Keywords

The third-party platform; The cross-network externality; Bilateral value-added services; Pricing strategies

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFB1701502]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies bilateral value-added services and pricing strategies on third-party platforms for manufacturing, taking into consideration the cross-network externality and the impact of value-added services on manufacturers and suppliers. Through a game theory model, the study analyzes the optimal decisions of the platform, proposing four different strategies and discussing the influence of cross-network externality strengths on platform decisions. The results show that platform service efficiencies determine the differences in bilateral value-added service levels and the effects of manufacturer and supplier cross-network externality strengths on the platform's optimal decisions.
This paper studies bilateral value-added services and pricing strategies of the third-party platform for manufacturing, in which we consider the cross-network externality and value-added service affecting the utility of manufacturers and suppliers joining the platform. By constructing a game theory model, we analyze the optimal decisions of the platform, and propose four different bilateral value-added service and pricing strategies, then discuss the influence of the cross-network externality strengths on the optimal decisions of the platform as well as the impact of the platform providing value-added services. Our results show that the platform's service efficiencies determine the difference of its bilateral value-added service levels. The platform will provide a higher service level for the side with higher service efficiency, but not always charge them more. When the service efficiency to manufacturers is higher than that to suppliers, the platform provides a relatively high value-added service level with a relatively low price for manufacturers and a relatively low value-added service level with a relatively high price for suppliers in some conditions. Moreover, the strengths of the manufacturer's and the supplier's cross-network externality have different effects on the optimal decisions of the platform. With the supplier's cross-network externality strength increasing, the platform may increase the value-added service level and the price for both manufacturers and suppliers. But with the manufacturer's cross-network externality strength increasing, the platform won't do that anymore. It will always increase the value-added service level but reduce the price for manufacturers. Meanwhile, it will increase both the value-added service level and the price for suppliers. Besides, comparing with the case of no value-added services, we find that when the platform provides value-added services for bilateral users, the platform always charges suppliers a higher price, but may charge manufacturers a lower price.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available