4.7 Article

Nonplanar sensing skins for structural health monitoring based on electrical resistance tomography

Journal

COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 1488-1507

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mice.12689

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [764810]
  2. Academy of Finland (Centre of Excellence of Inverse Modelling and Imaging) [303801]
  3. Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence of Inverse Modelling and Imaging [303801]
  4. Academy of Finland [314701, 320022]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [320022, 320022, 314701, 314701] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a method of extending ERT surface sensing technology to non-planar surfaces, solving the image reconstruction problem with techniques from Riemannian geometry and numerical methods. Experimental results demonstrate the feasibility and applicability of this method in non-planar geometries.
Electrical resistance tomography (ERT)-based distributed surface sensing systems, or sensing skins, offer alternative sensing techniques for structural health monitoring, providing capabilities for distributed sensing of, for example, damage, strain, and temperature. Currently, however, the computational techniques utilized for sensing skins are limited to planar surfaces. In this paper, to overcome this limitation, we generalize the ERT-based surface sensing to nonplanar surfaces covering arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures; we construct a framework in which we reformulate the image reconstruction problem of ERT using techniques of Riemannian geometry, and solve the resulting problem numerically. We test this framework in series of numerical and experimental studies. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed formulation and the applicability of ERT-based sensing skins to nonplanar geometries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available