4.7 Review

A review paper on direct tensile behavior and test methods of textile reinforced cementitious composites

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113661

Keywords

Tensile parameters; Standard tensile test method; Direct tensile stress-strain behavior; Textile reinforced cementitious composites (TRCCs); Influencing parameters

Funding

  1. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport [21NANO-B156177-02]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [158351] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review paper provides comprehensive information on the direct tensile behavior and test methods for textile reinforced cementitious composites (TRCCs). It summarizes the tensile parameters of TRCCs and discusses the influencing factors, while also evaluating various direct tensile test methods. The paper proposes conclusive requirements for a standard test method for assessing the tensile stress-strain behavior of TRCCs.
This review paper provides a key information, allowing readers to comprehensively understand the direct tensile behavior and test methods for textile reinforced cementitious composites (TRCCs). The tensile parameters of TRCCs corresponding to bilinear or trilinear tensile stress?strain behavior were summarized and the influ-encing factors on the tensile parameters were discussed. Various direct tensile test methods for TRCCs were evaluated according to the geometry of specimens, load transmitting mechanism, measurement and loading methods. Conclusive requirements for a standard test method for assessing the tensile stress?strain behavior of TRCCs were proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available