4.7 Article

Failure analysis of composite laminates under transverse shear load via XFEM

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113615

Keywords

Composite laminates; XFEM; Transverse shear test; Matrix fracture; Crack path

Funding

  1. Aviation Science Foundation of China [2017ZD03020, 2018ZA03003]
  2. Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the XFEM method is used to predict failure in composite laminates by determining the normal direction of fracture surfaces under different failure modes. A user-defined FORTRAN subroutine is implemented for Abaqus/Standard solver to model damage initiation and crack propagation, showing that XFEM can effectively predict crack initiation and propagation with smoother matrix failure paths.
Extended finite element method (XFEM) is introduced in this study, and the normal direction of fracture surface under different failure modes is determined, which provides a new and efficient technology for failure prediction of composite laminates. According to the failure criterion, a user-defined FORTRAN subroutine (UDMGINI) has been written for Abaqus/Standard solver to model the damage initiation and crack propagation of G(23) out-of-plane shear test. By comparing the load-displacement curve, strain field and failure mode of experiment, FEM and XFEM, XFEM can effectively predict the crack initiation and propagation. Meanwhile, the crack path of matrix failure simulated by XFEM is smooth without bifurcation, which is more consistent with experimental result. Moreover, by comparing damage factors of specimen before damage initiation in G(23) test, it is found that the matrix tensile failure occurs more easily than matrix compressive failure at the root of V-notch, where cracks are the first to initiate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available