4.5 Review Book Chapter

Properties of alternative microbial hosts used in synthetic biology: towards the design of a modular chassis

Journal

SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY-BOOK
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 303-313

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/EBC20160015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M009769/1, BB/L02683X/1, BB/K012231] Funding Source: Medline
  2. BBSRC [BB/L02683X/1, BB/M009769/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1485097] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chassis is the cellular host used as a recipient of engineered biological systems in synthetic biology. They are required to propagate the genetic information and to express the genes encoded in it. Despite being an essential element for the appropriate function of genetic circuits, the chassis is rarely considered in their design phase. Consequently, the circuits are transferred to model organisms commonly used in the laboratory, such as Escherichia coli, that may be suboptimal for a required function. In this review, we discuss some of the properties desirable in a versatile chassis and summarize some examples of alternative hosts for synthetic biology amenable for engineering. These properties include a suitable life style, a robust cell wall, good knowledge of its regulatory network as well as of the interplay of the host components with the exogenous circuits, and the possibility of developing whole-cell models and tuneable metabolic fluxes that could allow a better distribution of cellular resources (metabolites, ATP, nucleotides, amino acids, transcriptional and translational machinery). We highlight Pseudomonas putida, widely used in many different biotechnological applications as a prominent organism for synthetic biology due to its metabolic diversity, robustness and ease of manipulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available