4.6 Article

A Random Dynamical Systems Perspective on Isochronicity for Stochastic Oscillations

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
Volume 386, Issue 3, Pages 1603-1641

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-021-04077-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [SFB/TR109]
  2. Germany's Excellence Strategy-The Berlin Mathematics Research Center MATH+ [EXC-2046/1, 390685689]
  3. Lichtenberg Professorship of the VolkswagenFoundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discussion in the mathematical physics community has focused on defining isochrons for stochastic oscillations, comparing the approach of finding stochastic isochrons as equal expected return time sections with considering eigenfunctions of the backward Kolmogorov operator.
For an attracting periodic orbit (limit cycle) of a deterministic dynamical system, one defines the isochron for each point of the orbit as the cross-section with fixed return time under the flow. Equivalently, isochrons can be characterized as stable manifolds foliating neighborhoods of the limit cycle or as level sets of an isochron map. In recent years, there has been a lively discussion in the mathematical physics community on how to define isochrons for stochastic oscillations, i.e. limit cycles or heteroclinic cycles exposed to stochastic noise. The main discussion has concerned an approach finding stochastic isochrons as sections of equal expected return times versus the idea of considering eigenfunctions of the backward Kolmogorov operator. We discuss the problem in the framework of random dynamical systems and introduce a new rigorous definition of stochastic isochrons as random stable manifolds for random periodic solutions with noise-dependent period. This allows us to establish a random version of isochron maps whose level sets coincide with the random stable manifolds. Finally, we discuss links between the random dynamical systems interpretation and the equal expected return time approach via averaged quantities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available