4.6 Article

Influence of Nanoparticles on the Evaporation of a Nanodroplet from Solid Substrates: An Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Investigation

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126227

Keywords

Molecular dynamics; Droplet evaporation experiments; Nanofluids; Evaporation rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental and molecular dynamic simulations were used to study the evaporative behavior of liquid droplets in the presence of nanoparticles. It was found that droplets with higher density nanoparticles exhibit pinned behavior and promote pattern formation during evaporation. The simulations also suggest that higher nanoparticle-liquid interaction strengths lead to a delay in evaporation while experiencing higher heat flux on the substrate.
Molecular Dynamic simulations and experiments have been performed to investigate the evaporative behavior of a liquid droplet in the presence of nanoparticles on a smooth, heated flat plate. Nanofluids of different volume fractions with CuO and Al2O3 nanoparticles were prepared to obtain liquid droplets. Experiments were conducted for droplets of both nanofluids and base fluid (DI water). The results showed that in the pinned region of evaporation, droplets of nanofluids with higher volume fractions of dense nanoparticles evaporated by keeping their base pinned at the triple point contact line. It is also observed that the evaporation rate of nanofluid droplets with nanoparticles having higher density is slower and promoted a typical pattern formation. Molecular Dynamic simulations were further performed to analyse the influence of various nanoparticle-liquid interaction strengths (epsilon(np-l)) on evaporative behavior. The simulation results suggest that in the pinned evaporation stage, for higher values of epsilon(np-l), the droplet undergoes a delay on evaporation while subjected to higher heat flux on the substrate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available