4.5 Article

Investigating feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a simulator-based driving intervention for people with acquired brain injury: A randomised controlled pilot study

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 1277-1289

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02692155211002455

Keywords

Driving simulator; acquired brain injury; self-efficacy; self-awareness; rehabilitation interventions

Categories

Funding

  1. Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Strategic Grant Scheme [SGS16-0360]
  2. Royal Automobile Club of Victoria Sir Edmund Herring Memorial Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that simulator training had a positive impact on driver confidence for individuals with acquired brain injury. The Simulator group showed an increase in confidence ratings, while the Usual Care group reported a decrease. There was no significant change in self-awareness for the Simulator group compared to the Usual Care group, but the Simulator group performed slightly worse in on-road driving assessments.
Objective: To investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a driving simulator intervention on driving outcomes following acquired brain injury. Design: Pilot randomised controlled trial. Setting: Occupational therapy driver assessment and rehabilitation service. Subjects: Individuals post-acquired brain injury aiming to return to driving. Intervention: Eight sessions of simulated driver training over four weeks, in addition to usual care. Control: Usual care only. Main measures: Feasibility outcomes: Participant recruitment and retention; data completeness; therapy attendance and fidelity; adverse events. Performance outcomes: on-road driving performance; Simulator Sickness Questionnaire; Brain Injury Driving Self-Awareness Measure and Driving Comfort Scale - Daytime, assessed at baseline and five weeks post-randomisation. Results: Out of 523 individuals screened, 22 (4%) were recruited and randomised, with 20 completing their allocated group (n = 12 Simulator, n = 8 Usual Care). For those who completed training, session attendance was 100% with simulator sickness rated, on average, as mild. Six individuals (50%) in the Simulator group failed the on-road assessment, versus two (25%) in the Usual Care group (P = 0.373). On average, the Simulator group reported a positive change in confidence ratings (M = 5.77, SD = 13.96) compared to the Usual Care group, who reported a negative change (M = -6.97, SD = 8.47), P = 0.034. The Simulator group (M = 0.67, SD = 3.34) demonstrated no significant change in self-awareness relative to the Usual Care group (M = -0.83, SD = 1.83, P = 0.325). Conclusions: With adjustments to inclusion criteria and recruitment strategies, it may be feasible to deliver the intervention and conduct a larger trial. There is potential benefit of simulator training for improving driver confidence after acquired brain injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available