4.7 Article

Associations between dietary amino acid intakes and blood concentration levels

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 3772-3779

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.04.036

Keywords

Amino acids; Dietary questionnaire; Dietary intake; Blood levels; 24-H dietary recall

Funding

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
  2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London
  3. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  4. Ligue Contre le Cancer (France)
  5. Institut Gustave Roussy (France)
  6. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale (France)
  7. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (France)
  8. German Cancer Aid (Germany)
  9. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (Germany)
  10. German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam Rehbruecke (DIfE) (Germany)
  11. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany)
  12. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy (Italy)
  13. Compagnia di San Paolo (Italy)
  14. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS) (The Netherlands)
  15. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR) (The Netherlands)
  16. LK Research Funds (The Netherlands)
  17. Dutch Prevention Funds (The Netherlands)
  18. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland) (The Netherlands)
  19. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) (The Netherlands)
  20. Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands)
  21. Health Research Fund (FIS) Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) (Spain)
  22. Regional Government of Andalucia (Spain)
  23. Regional Government of Asturias (Spain)
  24. Regional Government of Basque Country (Spain)
  25. Regional Government of Murcia (Spain)
  26. Regional Government of Navarra (Spain)
  27. Catalan Institute of Oncology-ICO (Spain)
  28. Swedish Cancer Society (Sweden)
  29. Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  30. County Council of Skane (Sweden)
  31. County Council of VaEurosterbotten (Sweden)
  32. Cancer Research UK (United Kingdom) [14,136, C8221/A29017]
  33. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) [1,000,143, MR/M012190/1]
  34. National Research Council (Italy)
  35. MRC [MR/M012190/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found weak positive correlations and dose responses between most essential and conditionally essential AA intake and blood concentrations, but not for non-essential AAs.
Background and aims: Emerging evidence suggests a role of amino acids (AAs) in the development of various diseases including renal failure, liver cirrhosis, diabetes and cancer. However, mechanistic pathways and the effects of dietary AA intakes on circulating levels and disease outcomes are unclear. We aimed to compare protein and AA intakes, with their respective blood concentrations in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Methods: Dietary protein and AA intakes were assessed via the EPIC dietary questionnaires (DQ) and 24h dietary recalls (24-HDR). A subsample of 3768 EPIC participants who were free of cancer had blood AA concentrations measured. To investigate how circulating levels relate to their respective intakes, dietary AA intake was examined in quintiles and ANOVA tests were run. Pearson correlations were examined for continous associations between intakes and blood concentrations. Results: Dietary AA intakes (assessed with the DQ) and blood AA concentrations were not strongly correlated (-0.15 < r < 0.17) and the direction of the correlations depended on AA class: weak positive correlations were found for most essential AAs (isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine) and conditionally essential AAs (arginine and tyrosine), while negative associations were found for non-essential AAs. Similar results were found when using the 24-HDR. When conducting ANOVA tests for essential AAs, higher intake quintiles were linked to higher blood AA concentrations, except for histidine and phenylalanine. For non-essential AAs and glycine, an inverse relationship was observed. Conditionally-essential AAs showed mixed results. Conclusions: Weak positive correlations and dose responses were found between most essential and conditionally essential AA intakes, and blood concentrations, but not for the non-essential AAs. These results suggest that intake of dietary AA might be related to physiological AA status, particularly for the essential AAs. However, these results should be further evaluated and confirmed in large-scale prospective studies. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available