4.7 Article

The goldilocks problem: Nutrition and its impact on glycaemic control

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 3677-3687

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.05.002

Keywords

Nutrition management; Glucose tolerance; Glycemic control; Insulin therapy; Intensive care

Funding

  1. NZ National Science Challenge 7, Science for Technology and Innovation [2019S3CRS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of nutritional management on blood glucose outcomes in intensive care, finding that coordination of nutrition and insulin therapy is crucial for effective glycemic control. Results suggest that adjusting nutrition alongside insulin can improve glycemic control, particularly in patients with persistent hyperglycemia or low glucose tolerance.
Background: Glucose intolerance and insulin resistance manifest as hyperglycaemia in intensive care, which is associated with mortality and morbidities. Glycaemic control (GC) may improve outcomes, though safe and effective control has proven elusive. Nutritional glucose intake affects blood glucose (BG) outcomes, but few protocols actively control it. This study aims to examine BG outcomes in the context of nutritional management during GC. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of 5 glycaemic control cohorts spanning 4 years (n 1/4 273) from Christchurch Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU). GC is delivered using a single model-based protocol (STAR), with default 4.4-8.0 mmol/L target range via. modulation of insulin and nutrition. Clinical adaptations/cohorts include variations on upper target (UL-9 with 9.0 mmol/L, reducing workload and nutrition responsiveness), and insulin only (IO) with clinically set nutrition at 3 glucose concentrations (71 g/L vs. 120 and 180 g/L in the TARGET study). Results: Percent of BG hours in the 4.4-8.0 mmol/L range highest under standard STAR conditions (78%), and was lower at 64% under UL-9, likely due to reduced time-responsiveness of nutrition-insulin changes. By comparison, IO only resulted in 64-69% BG in range across different nutrition types. A subset of patients receiving high glucose nutrition under IO were persistently hyperglycaemic, indicating patient-specific glucose tolerance. Conclusion: STAR GC is most effective when nutrition and insulin are modulated together with timely responsiveness to persistent hyperglycaemia. Results imply modulation of nutrition alongside insulin improves GC, particularly in patients with persistent hyperglycaemia/low glucose tolerance. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available