Surgical treatment and clinical outcome of large pediatric interhemispheric cysts with callosal agenesis: A systematic literature review with four additional patients

Objective: Large interhemispheric cysts (IHC) with partial or complete agenesis of corpus callosum (ACC) constitute a heterogeneous group of rare disorders. Neurosurgical treatment, in the terms of if, when and how to operate, remains unclear Methods: We performed a surgical literature review of series or reports of IHCs with callosal anomalies; we evaluated whether revision surgeries were necessary and considered the dimensional change in the cyst postoperatively and the developmental outcome. We also reported our experience with sfour patients treated by programmable cysto-peritoneal (CP) shunting. Patients? clinical history, neuroradiological and neuropsychological performances were evaluated pre and post operatively. Results: The review included 133 patients with surgically-treated IHCs. Although most authors are in agreement to perform surgery if the patients present signs of raised ICP and to not intervene in those completely asymptomatic, for other signs and symptoms the debate is still open; only few authors performed cognitive tests pre and post-operatively. Shunting procedures were successful in 60% of our reviewed cases and often lead to a major cyst collapse. Craniotomy achieves good results but is extremely invasive. Endoscopy is minimally invasive and our review demonstrated a success rate of 66%. However, endoscopy does not ensue a complete cyst collapse. Our series and review seem to suggest a possible link between parenchymal re-expansion and cognitive outcome. Conclusions: Early and effective surgery seems to obtain a greater cerebral parenchyma re-expansion and longterm cognitive evolution. Endoscopy is safe and reliable, but more data is needed on the impact of uncomplete cyst collapse on neurocognitive outcome.

Automated summary

Surgical treatment of large interhemispheric cysts (IHC) with corpus callosum anomalies remains unclear, with varying success rates for different procedures. Craniotomy is effective but highly invasive, while endoscopy offers a minimally invasive approach with a 66% success rate. Research suggests a potential link between cerebral parenchymal re-expansion post-surgery and cognitive outcomes.