4.4 Article

Combined Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Improves Neurologic Outcomes in Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Journal

CLINICAL LUNG CANCER
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 110-119

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.10.014

Keywords

Central nervous system metastases; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Intracranial metastases; Lung cancer; Radiation

Categories

Funding

  1. Herman and Gwen Shapiro Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that combining stereotactic radiation (SRT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can improve overall survival, reduce distant brain failure, and decrease neurologic death in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are routinely used in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic radiation (SRT) alone is currently the standard treatment for most NSCLC brain metastases. It is unknown if receiving ICIs at the time of SRT improves neurologic outcomes. Herein, we have shown that combining SRT with ICIs improves overall survival, reduces distant brain failure, and reduces neurologic death in patients with NSCLC brain metastases. Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) alone versus SRT and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and Methods: Patients treated for their first diagnosis of intracranial metastases with SRT or SRT plus ICI were retrospectively identified. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant brain failure (DBF), neurologic death, and rates of radiation necrosis were calculated. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses with competing risk analysis were performed. Results: Seventy-seven patients with 132 lesions were analyzed, including 44 patients with 68 lesions in the SRT group and 33 patients with 64 lesions in the SRT plus ICI group. There were no differences in baseline factors between groups. Use of ICI predicted for decreased DBF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.84; P = .01), decreased rates of neurologic death (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.100.85; P = .02), and better OS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.91; P = .03). Two-year LC was 97% for the SRT + ICI group, and 86% for the SRT-alone group (P = .046). Actuarial 2-year DBF was 39% for the SRT + ICI group and 66% for the SRT alone group (P = .016). On MVA, ICI use persisted in predicting lower incidence of neurologic death (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.72; P = .01) and DBF (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; P = .01) when adjusted for competing risk of death. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with NSCLC brain metastases, ICI use combined with SRT predicted for improved LC and OS and decreased DBF and risk of neurologic death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available