4.3 Article

Use of ring-enhancement and focal necrosis to differentiate pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on CT and MRI

Journal

CLINICAL IMAGING
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 134-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.041

Keywords

Pancreas; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [181917]
  2. Swiss Society of Radiology
  3. Swiss Cancer League [BIL KLS-4854-08-2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the ability of ring-enhancing sign and focal necrosis to diagnose ASqC on MRI and CT. Results showed that MRI displayed ring enhancement in ASqC with higher reader confidence compared to CT and FN in ASqC with greater inter-reader agreement. The concurrent presence of these two imaging features should raise high suspicion for ASqC.
Purpose: To assess the ability of the ring-enhancing sign and focal necrosis to diagnose adenosquamous carcinoma (ASqC), a variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), on MRI and CT. Methods: The following features of ASqC and conventional PDAC were evaluated on CT and MRI: tumor size, location, margins, borders (non-exophytic, exophytic), and T1 signal intensity. Two readers, blinded to histopathology results, rated their confidence in detecting ring-enhancement and focal necrosis (FN) on a 5-point Likert scale on both MRI and CT. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cohen's kappa (k). Results: A total of 24 patients were included: eight patients with treatment na & iuml;ve and histologically proven ASqC (six women, mean age: 63, range: 40-75) and 16 patients with PDAC (eight women, mean age: 67, range: 47-83). Statistically significant differences between ASqC and PDAC were seen in tumor size, location, presence of FN, and ring enhancement (p = 0.01-0.037). The readers were more confident in depicting the key differentiating feature ring-enhancement in ASqC on MRI compared to CT (confidence 1.71 +/- 0.49 vs. 0.88 +/- 0.35, p = 0.017) with moderate inter-reader agreement (k = 0.46 and 0.5, respectively). FN showed substantial inter reader agreement on MR and moderate agreement on CT (k = 0.67 and 0.5, respectively). Conclusions: Compared to CT, MRI depicts ring-enhancement in ASqC with greater reader confidence and FN in ASqC with higher inter-reader agreement. The concurrent presence of these two imaging features should raise high suspicion for ASqC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available