4.7 Review

Magnitude and Time-Trend Analysis of Postendoscopy Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages E31-E50

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.032

Keywords

Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; Quality; Endoscopy; Surveillance

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [U34-DK124174, K08-DK119475]
  2. National Institutes of Health [T32-DK007038]
  3. University of Colorado Department of Medicine Outstanding Early Scholars Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to estimate the proportion of postendoscopy esophageal adenocarcinoma (PEEC) within the first year after Barrett's esophagus (BE) diagnosis. The results showed a high proportion of PEEC among patients with EAC and EAC-F HGD, and the proportion was inversely related to incident EAC. It is necessary to use the best endoscopic techniques and implement quality measures and educational tools to improve neoplasia detection and reduce PEEC.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Identification of postendoscopy esophageal adenocarcinoma (PEEC) among Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients presents an opportunity to improve survival of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We aimed to estimate the proportion of PEEC within the first year after BE diagnosis. METHODS: Multiple databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases) were searched until September 2020 for original studies with at least 1-year follow-up evaluation that reported EAC and/or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in the first year after index endoscopy in nondysplastic BE, low-grade dysplasia, or indefinite dysplasia. The proportions of PEEC defined using EAC alone and EAC-F HGD were calculated by dividing EAC or EAC-F HGD in the first year over the total number of EAC or EAC HGD, respectively. RESULTS: We included 52 studies with 145,726 patients and a median follow-up period of 4.8 years. The proportion of PEEC (EAC) was 21% (95% CI, 13-31) and PEEC (EAC-F HGD) was 26% (95% CI, 19-34). Among studies with nondysplastic BE only, the PEEC (EAC) proportion was 17% (95% CI, 11-23) and PEEC (EAC-F HGD) was 14% (95% CI, 8-19). Among studies with 5 or more years of follow-up evaluation, the PEEC (EAC) proportion was 10% and PEEC (EAC HGD) was 19%. Meta-regression analysis showed a strong inverse relationship between PEEC and incident EAC (P < .001). The PEEC (EAC) proportion increased from 5% in studies published before 2000 to 30% after 2015. Substantial heterogeneity was observed for most analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PEEC accounts for a high proportion of HGD/EACs and is proportional to reduction in incident EAC. Using best endoscopic techniques now and performing future research on improving neoplasia detection through implementation of quality measures and educational tools is needed to reduce PEEC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available