4.7 Article

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Lymph Node Metastasis: Treatment-Related Outcomes and the Role of Tumor Genomics in Patient Selection

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages 4101-4108

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0412

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology
  2. NCI Cancer Center Core Grant [P30-CA008748]
  3. NCI [U01-CA238444]
  4. Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC) Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC) - NIH/NCATS [UL1TR002384]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For node-negative patients, resection had the longest overall survival, while for node-positive patients, there was no difference in survival between resection and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, both of which were superior to systemic chemotherapy alone. Patients with high-risk genetic alterations had poorer survival outcomes.
Purpose: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) drastically reduces survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). Optimal treatment is ill defined, and it is unclear whether tumor mutational profiling can support treatment decisions. Experimental Design: Patients with liver-limited IHC with or without LNM treated with resection (N = 237), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC; N = 196), or systemic chemotherapy alone (SYS; N = 140) at our institution between 2000 and 2018 were included. Genomic sequencing was analyzed to determine whether genetic alterations could stratify outcomes for patients with LNM. Results: For node-negative patients, resection was associated with the longest median overall survival [OS, 59.9 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 47.2-74.31], followed by HAIC (24.9 months; 95% CI, 20.3- 29.6), and SYS (13.7 months; 95% CI, 8.9-15.9; P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival for node-positive patients treated with resection (median OS, 19.7 months; 95% CI, 12.1-27.2) or HAIC (18.1 months; 95% CI, 14.1- 26.6; P = 0.560); however, survival in both groups was greater than SYS (11.2 months; 95% CI, 14.1 - 26.6; P = 0.024). Node-positive patients with at least one high- risk genetic alteration (TP53 mutation, KRAS mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion) had worse survival compared to wild-type patients (median OS, 12.1 months; 95% CI, 5.7-21.5; P = 0.002), regardless of treatment. Conversely, there was no difference in survival for node-positive patients with IDH1/2 mutations compared to wild-type patients. Conclusions: There was no difference in OS for patients with node-positive IHC treated by resection versus HAIC, and both treatments had better survival than SYS alone. The presence of high-risk genetic alterations provides valuable prognostic information that may help guide treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available