4.1 Article

Patterns of ellipsoid zone change associated with visual outcome for diabetic macular oedema

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 48-54

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1896333

Keywords

Central subfield thickness; diabetic macular oedema; ellipsoid zone; macular ischaemia; optical coherence tomography; retinal oedema

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that non-perfused macula was significantly associated with both the development and poor restoration of EZ disruption. The duration of EZ disruption could be more predictive for improvement of vision over 12 months compared to baseline status.
Background: To investigate predictors for ellipsoid zone (EZ) dynamics and the association with visual acuity after treatment for diabetic macular oedema Methods: A total of 135 eyes from 135 patients with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema were retrospectively enrolled in this study. EZ status was evaluated by optical coherence tomography at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Macular perfusion status was analysed by fluorescein angiography. Duration of EZ disruption was quantified by giving scores from 0 to 5 based on the sum of visits with evidence of EZ disruption. Linear regression models were used to predict factors for scores of EZ disruption. Binary logistic regression was used to predict various EZ biomarkers for final visual acuity improvement. Results: Thirty of 87 eyes (34.4%) with intact EZ at baseline developed subsequent EZ disruption. For those with EZ disruption at baseline, 17 of 48 (35.4%) patients had restoration of disrupted EZ over time. Non-perfused macula was associated with both earlier development of EZ disruption and poor restoration (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011, respectively). Non-perfused macula, absence of epiretinal membrane, and EZ disruption at baseline predicted higher EZ scores (p < 0.001, p = 0.022 and p < 0.001, respectively). Higher EZ scores (p = 0.016), but not baseline EZ disruption (p = 0.56), were less likely to have improvement of final vision 5 letters or more. Conclusion: Macular perfusion status played an independent role in EZ dynamics. Duration of EZ disruption could be more predictive than baseline status for improvement of vision over 12 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available