4.7 Article

Using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in peripheral blood for the follow up of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab-based combination therapy

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 516, Issue -, Pages 136-141

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.01.021

Keywords

Multiple myeloma; MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry; M-protein; Immunofixation; Daratumumab

Funding

  1. Society of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  2. Binding Site
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Core Grant [P30 CA008748]
  4. National Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of MALDI-TOF MS for detecting M-proteins is helpful in assessing complete response in patients treated with monoclonal antibody therapies.
Background: Daratumumab-based combination therapies have shown high rates of complete response (CR) and minimal residual disease negativity in patients with multiple myeloma. However, daratumumab, an IgGx monoclonal antibody, interferes with electrophoretic techniques making it difficult to reliably define residual disease versus CR, especially in patients with IgGx multiple myeloma. Methods: Enrichment with polyclonal sheep antibody-coated magnetic microparticles combined with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis was used to detect M-proteins in serial samples from newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab-based therapy. The performance of the MALDITOF MS assay was compared to that of a routine test panel (serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), immunofixation (IFE) and serum free light chain (FLC)). Results: Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS to SPEP/IFE/FLC showed a concordance of 84.9% (p < 0.001). When MALDI-TOF MS and FLC results were combined, the M -protein detection rate was the same or better than the routine test panel. For the 9 patients who obtained CR during follow-up, MALDI-TOF MS detected an M -protein in 46% of subsequent samples. Daratumumab could be distinguished from the M-protein in 215/222 samples. Conclusion: MALDI-TOF MS is useful in assessing CR in patients treated with monoclonal antibody-based therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available