4.7 Article

Heart Failure With Targeted Cancer Therapies Mechanisms and Cardioprotection

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 128, Issue 10, Pages 1576-1593

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318223

Keywords

cardiotoxicity; heart failure; incidence; survival; tyrosine

Funding

  1. [R01HL148272]
  2. [R01HL152707]
  3. [R34HL146927]
  4. [R21HL141802]
  5. [R21150723]
  6. [R21HL152148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing use of targeted therapies in oncology has led to significant improvements in survival rates, but also presents challenges in managing toxicities associated with long-term treatment. Overlapping signaling pathways may result in systemic toxicities, with cardiovascular toxicities being of particular concern.
Oncology has seen growing use of newly developed targeted therapies. Although this has resulted in dramatic improvements in progression-free and overall survival, challenges in the management of toxicities related to longer-term treatment of these therapies have also become evident. Although a targeted approach often exploits the differences between cancer cells and noncancer cells, overlap in signaling pathways necessary for the maintenance of function and survival in multiple cell types has resulted in systemic toxicities. In particular, cardiovascular toxicities are of important concern. In this review, we highlight several targeted therapies commonly used across a variety of cancer types, including HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)+ targeted therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, androgen deprivation therapies, and MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase)/BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B) inhibitors. We present the oncological indications, heart failure incidence, hypothesized mechanisms of cardiotoxicity, and potential mechanistic rationale for specific cardioprotective strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available