4.5 Article

Fabrication of GaAs/SiO2/Si and GaAs/Si heterointerfaces by surface-activated chemical bonding at room temperature*

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS B
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/abf917

Keywords

surface-activation bonding; energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy; intermix; point defects

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61505003, 61674140]
  2. Beijing Education Commission Project [SQKM201610005008]
  3. Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation [2020-Z2-043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface-activated bonding (SAB) creates strong bonding at room temperature through an intermixing process among different atoms at the heterointerface, enhanced by point defects introduced by the activation process. Bonding energies of GaAs/SiO2/Si and GaAs/Si wafers are 0.7 J/m(2) and 0.6 J/m(2) respectively.
The room-temperature (RT) bonding mechanisms of GaAs/SiO2/Si and GaAs/Si heterointerfaces fabricated by surface-activated bonding (SAB) are investigated using a focused ion beam (FIB) system, cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM). According to the element distribution detected by TEM and EDX, it is found that an intermixing process occurs among different atoms at the heterointerface during the RT bonding process following the surface-activation treatment. The diffusion of atoms at the interface is enhanced by the point defects introduced by the process of surface activation. We can confirm that through the point defects, a strong heterointerface can be created at RT. The measured bonding energies of GaAs/SiO2/Si and GaAs/Si wafers are 0.7 J/m(2) and 0.6 J/m(2). The surface-activation process can not only remove surface oxides and generate dangling bonds, but also enhance the atomic diffusivity at the interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available