4.6 Article

On the Structural Assignments Underlying R. B. Woodward's Most Personal Data That Led to the Woodward-Hoffmann Rules: Subramania Ranganathan's Key Role and Related Research by E. J. Corey and A. G. Hortmann

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 24, Pages 7000-7016

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202004790

Keywords

Corey; dihydrocostunolide; structure determination; vitamin B-12; Woodward– Hoffmann rules

Funding

  1. NSF [XSEDE CHE-030089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers successfully predicted the NMR spectra of key compounds through analyzing the early work of two chemists, providing computational support for the structure assignments at that time.
In the early 1960s, as part of R. B. Woodward's isoxazole route to vitamin B-12, Subramania Ranganathan uncovered two coupled sets of stereospecific reactions, a thermal set and a photochemical set. These four reactions illustrated the alternating configurations that were the major data points that prompted the solution of the no-mechanism problem. Though Ranganathan's reactions played a major role, according to Woodward, in the development of the Woodward-Hoffmann rules, they were published only as part of the documentation of a lecture given by Woodward in 1966. The authors of this paper have uncovered Subramania Ranganathan's 1964 postdoctoral report and have used modern quantum chemical theory to predict the H-1 NMR spectra for Ranganathan's key compounds, providing support for the structure assignments made by Woodward and Ranganathan. A similar set of alternating, stereospecific reactions was observed by E. J. Corey and Alfred Hortmann in their 1963 total synthesis of dihydrocostunolide. We also have applied the computational process used for Ranganathan's compounds to Hortmann's compounds, now also including the calculation of coupling constants, and find computational support for Corey and Hortmann's structure assignments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available