4.6 Review

Photoluminescent Carbon Quantum Dots: Synthetic Approaches and Photophysical Properties

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 37, Pages 9466-9481

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202100823

Keywords

bottom-up synthesis; carbon quantum dots; photoluminescence; quantum yields; top-down synthesis

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [19K22316]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K22316] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the synthetic methodologies, basic characteristics, and advantages of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) over other quantum dots. The author discusses the topic from the perspectives of definition, photophysical properties, and makes comparisons between CQDs and MSQDs.
A number of synthetic methodologies and applications of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) have been reported since they were first discovered nearly two decades ago. Unlike metal-based or semiconductor-based (e. g., metal chalcogenides) quantum dots (MSQDs), CQDs have the unique feature of being prepared through a variety of synthetic protocols, which are typically understood from considerations of reaction models and photoluminescence mechanisms. Consequently, this brief review article describes quantum dots, in general, and CQDs, in particular, from various viewpoints: (i) their definition, (ii) their photophysical properties, and (iii) the superiority of CQDs over MSQDs. Where possible, comparisons are made between CQDs and MSQDs. First, however, the review begins with a general brief description of quantum dots (QDs) as nanomaterials (sizes <= 10 nm), followed by a short description of MSQDs and CQDs. Described subsequently are the various top-down and bottom-up approaches to synthesize CQDs followed by their distinctive photophysical properties (emission spectra; quantum yields, phi s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available